Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 4/10/2025 2:56 AM, Mikko wrote:No proof of this principle has been shown so its use is not valid.On 2025-04-09 20:35:30 +0000, olcott said:*Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
On 4/9/2025 1:58 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:It is not a good idea to think that everybody is just like you.Op 09.apr.2025 om 19:29 schreef olcott:Simply over your level of technical competence.On 4/8/2025 10:31 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:If HHH would correctly simulate DD (and the functions called by DD) then the simulated HHH would return to DD and DD would halt.Op 08.apr.2025 om 17:13 schreef olcott:DDD CORRECTLY SIMULATED BY HHHOn 4/8/2025 2:45 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Everyone with a little bit of C knowledge understands that if HHH returns with a value 0, then DDD halts.Op 08.apr.2025 om 06:33 schreef olcott:int DD()typedef void (*ptr)();In this case there is nothing to prevent, because the finite string specifies a program that halts.
int HHH(ptr P);
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
int main()
{
HHH(DD);
}
*Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
It is always correct for any simulating termination
analyzer to stop simulating and reject any input that
would otherwise prevent its own termination.
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
This stuff is simply over-your-head.
HHH(DD) meets the above: *Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
Anyone with sufficient competence with the C programming language
will understand this.
NOT ANY OTHER DAMN DDD IN THE UNIVERSE NITWIT.
But HHH failed to complete the simulation of the halting program,HHH is only required to report on the behavior of its
own correct simulation (meaning the according to the
semantics of the C programming language) and would be
incorrect to report on any other behavior.
because the programmer was dreaming of an infinite recursion.I really think that you may simply be a troll playing head games.
If I didn't have to tell you this hundreds of times and you didn't
persist in the straw-man deception I would not have called you a nitwit.
It is always correct for any simulating termination
analyzer to stop simulating and reject any input that
would otherwise prevent its own termination.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.