Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally?

On 5/3/2024 2:30 PM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 03 May 2024 07:25:47 -0500 schrieb olcott:
 

On 5/2/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

Yes, there are a LOT of non-terminating programs that can be detected.
>
The problem is that when you make H and D actual programs, if H(D,D)
returns 0, then D(D) is NOT a "non-terminating" program.
>
Now, part of the issue is that this form of Termination Analysis isn't
as concerned about being able to be 100% for every possible program, but
wants to look at what classes of programs CAN be very reliably decided on.
>
So yes, it is RELATED to halting, but has a different criteria for what
is considered a solution. In part, because they KNOW that 100% accuracy
on EVERY program is impossible, so they want to study what CAN be done.
>
In the field, rejecting "hostile" programs that are trying to be
intentionally hard to decide isn't considered a failure.
>

>
YOU TRIED TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS.
I ONLY GLANCED AT A FEW OF YOUR WORDS TO TELL THAT YOU
TRIED TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT. ONCE I CAN TELL THAT YOU
ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT I QUIT READING.

 This reminds me a lot of what you accused us of
(reading only the beginning and jumping to conclusions).

I told Richard that I am only willing to discuss one single point
until we have mutual agreement on this point.
Most everyone uses his change-the-subject form of rebuttal
to make sure that we never get any closure on anything.
*Because of my POD24 diagnosis I can no longer tolerate that*
Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34614146/
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer