Re: Olcott is a Liar!

On 2024-05-18 01:07:04 +0000, Richard Damon said:

On 5/17/24 12:34 PM, olcott wrote:
 

The key thing to note is that no D correctly simulated by any H of
every H/D pair specified by the template below ever reaches its own
line 06 and halts.

  Which, since I posted over two weeks ago how to do it in C, means that you don't have the needed knowledge of the C programming language, or about what truth actually is.
 And the fact that you refuse to take up any of my challenges to have me repost the link (because you clearly prefer to just lie rather that try to do some research) it is clear that you are not actually certain of your claim, so you know you may be lying, but you do it anyway.
 And you are proven to just be an ignorant damned pathological liar.
 

 There are several correct diagnostic messages, what one are you suggesting?
 

 If there are correct diagnostic messages, then your code is not "C" code.

It could stil be conforming C code. The standard permits that an
implementation accepts and executes programs that are not permitted
by the standard. Therefore almost any piece of text is or can be
a conforming C program. An implementation is free to choose what
happens when such program is executed. The main restriction is that
implementation specific extensions must not alter the meaning of
programs (more than allowed by the standard) that don't use those
extensions. For example, an implementation is not allowed to have
new reserved words that don't begin with two underline characters.
--
Mikko