Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 5/18/24 09:02, Mikko wrote:The main question is whether both arguments of H on the line 00 can haveOn 2024-05-17 17:14:01 +0000, olcott said:I recommend ignoring olcott - nothing good ever comes from paying
attention to him.
...On 5/17/2024 5:53 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-05-16 14:50:19 +0000, olcott said:
On 5/16/2024 5:48 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-05-15 15:24:57 +0000, olcott said:You've cross-posted this to comp.lang.c after a long-running discussionThe standard allows that an program is executed but does notIt is not nit picky syntax that is the issue here.If your compiler does not reject that program it is not a conformingIt has been fully operational code under Windows andtypedef int (*ptr)(); // ptr is pointer to int functionCan you find any compiler that is liberal enough to accept that?
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x);
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03 int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04 if (Halt_Status)
05 HERE: goto HERE;
06 return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11 H(D,D);
12 return 0;
13 }
Linux for two years.
C compiler. The semantics according to C standard is that a diagnostic
message must be given. The standard does not specify what happens if
you execute that program anyway.
The SEMANTICS OF THE C PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE SPECIFIES
No D simulated correctly by any H of every H/D pair specified
by the above template ever reaches its own line 06 and halts.
specify what happens when an invalid program is executed.
solely on comp.theory. Presumably you're doing that because you want
some discussion about what the standard says about this code. For the
sake of those of us who have not been following that discussion on
comp.theory, could you please identify what it is that you think renders
this code invalid? Offhand, I don't see anything wrong with it, but I'm
far more reliable when I say "I see an error" than when I say "I don't
see an error".
Which non-standard extension does it use?Fully operational software that runs under Widows and LinuxNo, it does not. As the program is not strictly comforming
proves that the above is true EMPIRICALLY.
and uses a non-standard extension some implementation may
execute it differently or refuse to execute.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.