Re: Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases

On 5/21/24 1:03 AM, olcott wrote:

On 5/20/2024 11:47 PM, immibis wrote:

On 20/05/24 14:00, David Brown wrote:

On 20/05/2024 11:16, immibis wrote:

On 19/05/24 21:48, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>
No shit. Sick. Puke! Wow.
>
>
If olcott loves child porn and claims to be a god, well... Is there any hope? Puke! Gross. Sick fuck!

>
I am not commenting on Olcott's habits but in this exchange, you are the troll. Please cease.

>
Indeed.
>
If someone has hard evidence of a crime (claiming to be "god" is not a crime), take it to the relevant authorities

>
Be aware that Peter Olcott was already convicted, sentenced, jailed, and released for possession of child pornography. His legal defense of being God did not work. None of this was speculation by Chris, but he is still a troll.
>

 You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
by your IP address.
 

Be careful, you may find yourself on the flip side of that suit.
You have admitted to your own nature of a reckless disregard for the truth.
I will admit, that I don't know what the results of the case were, but it was factually established that you WERE arrested, and it was reported that you claim was that it was ok because you were God.
I do wonder sometimes if your insane behavior is to maintain the appearance that you are not mentally competent to stand trial.