Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 21/05/2024 17:47, James Kuyper wrote:[...]On 5/21/24 05:36, David Brown wrote:That was not the kind of child abuse under discussion. But if you are considering "child abuse" in more general terms, then you would be wrong - people who believe in "spare the rod and spoil the child", right up to those who support the absurdly inappropriately termed "honour killing", do so in the belief that they are doing the best for the child, and /failing/ to discipline harshly would be child abuse.
...so angry that I lashed out", first find someone who is /not/ made angry>
by child abuse.)
There are many people who object strenuously to having certain practices
labelled child abuse. In particular, they believe that children need to
be disciplined harshly to ensure that they grow up into properly moral
adults, adults who know, in particular, that it is moral to administer
such discipline when needed. I do not agree with those attitudes, bus I
think that they do qualify as "someone who is /not/ made angry by child
abuse".
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.