Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###

On 5/21/24 12:10, immibis wrote:

On 21/05/24 17:48, James Kuyper wrote:

It also doesn't apply outside the legal system. If you actually
witnessed a crime, you're not required to pretend that the perpetrator
is innocent, and if you've witnessed something exonerating, you're not
required to accept the decision of a court that incorrectly found
someone guilty.

 
In Germany you may be required to. ...

No one can force you to believe that the court was correct in its
decision. They may prohibit you from expressing that opinion, but they
can't prevent you from holding it.

... Implying that someone committed a
crime which a court found them innocent of may be considered defamation
or insult.

That's ridiculous - one of the most important purposes of freedom of
speech is to be able hold government officials accountable for failing
to do their job correctly.