Sujet : Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 25. May 2024, 22:20:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2th6a$319s1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/25/2024 3:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2024 2:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 2:27 PM, olcott wrote:
As soon as you first hit the strawman deception change-the-subject
fake rebuttal I pint this pout and erase everything else that you say.
>
*Thread renamed to be 100% precisely accurate*
Any divergence from the subject of the thread gets boilerplate reply.
>
>
In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, admitting that you plan to change them.
>
>
<snip so that *Usenet Article Lookup* finds the whole message>
http://al.howardknight.net/
>
Not at all. I simply utterly reject the dishonest dodge
of the strawman deception change-the-subject rebuttal.
>
typedef int (*ptr)(); // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00 int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01 int D(ptr p)
02 {
03 int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04 if (Halt_Status)
05 HERE: goto HERE;
06 return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11 H(D,D);
12 return 0;
13 }
>
The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is
correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many
reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair
was being referred to.
>
*Correct Simulation Defined*
This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of
correct simulation that diverges from this notion.
>
A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates at least one
of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86
instructions of D.
>
This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
recursive simulation.
>
*Execution Trace*
Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D); H(D,D) simulates lines 01, 02, and 03 of
D. This invokes H(D,D) again to repeat the process in endless recursive
simulation.
>
>
In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, admitting that you plan to change them.
Not at all and you cannot show that I disagree with the above
words to the slightest trace of any degree what-so-ever.
*Liar Liar Pants on fire? Will assume so until proven otherwise*
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer