Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years

On 2024-06-01 15:09:02 +0000, olcott said:

On 6/1/2024 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-05-29 18:31:52 +0000, olcott said:
 

*two dozen people were simply wrong*

 Why are people who are wrong so important that they deserve
a subject line? I would think that people who are right are
more interesting.
 

 This is the key mistake of the definition of the halting problem itself.
Linz makes this same mistake. I already covered this extensively in
another reply.

The word "this" above does not denote anything so the first sentence
does not mean anything. The word "same" in the second sentence refers
to "this" in the first sentnece and therefore does not denote, either,
so the second sentence does not say anything either. So the third
sentence says that you covevered nothing.

That these two dozen different people are wrong about this shows that
the only basis for any rebuttal of my proof for the last three years IS
WRONG.

That you claim that these two dozen people are wrong does not show
anything. It probably wouldn't even if you could show that they
really were wrong.
--
Mikko