Sujet : Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.com (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 05. Jun 2024, 19:07:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v3q9hk$34b9u$9@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:05:11 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/5/2024 2:05 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-03 18:09:30 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/3/2024 9:17 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-03 12:25:48 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/3/2024 2:39 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-02 14:50:26 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/2/2024 4:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.mei.2024 om 15:40 schreef olcott:
The code has been anylzed by several people so carefully that any
disagreement really is like s like disagreeing that 2 + 3 = 5.
But you disagree anyway:
It has been "analyzed" by dogmatic assertions utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning. It is empirically proven that the behavior of the
directly executed DD(DD) is different than the behavior of DD correctly
simulated by HH. People can lie about this yet cannot possibly show
otherwise.
How can a simulation be correct that behaves differently than the direct
execution?
-- joes
Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03
Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03