Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/7/2024 3:16 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:And that statement is just a lie, as your claim has not be "verified" by anyone but your own claims.olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:I should have said more accurately that everyone that understandsOn 6/7/2024 2:57 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:>In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:>[ .... ]>If people are going to be dishonest about simple things such as the
actual behavior of actual x86 code where they consistently deny
verified facts ....>You should stop swearing. "Verified facts" has a meaning,Everyone knows that the following is a verified fact and>
they dishonestly deflect.
That is untrue. There is at least one person who doesn't know "it's a
verified fact" (me).
>
this knows it is a verified fact.
Try to show how this DD correctly simulated by any HH everAnd why do we care?
stops running without having its simulation aborted by HH.
_DD()And thus you admit that your H isn't a Halt Decider, as a Halt Decider MUST report on the behavior of the directly executed machine described by its input, in this case DD(DD)
[00001e12] 55 push ebp
[00001e13] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00001e15] 51 push ecx
[00001e16] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00001e19] 50 push eax ; push DD
[00001e1a] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001e1d] 51 push ecx ; push DD
[00001e1e] e85ff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH
A {correct simulation} means that each instruction of the
above x86 machine language of DD is correctly simulated
by HH and simulated in the correct order.
Anyone claiming that HH should report on the behavior
of the directly executed DD(DD) is requiring a violation
of the above definition of correct simulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.