Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure

On 6/7/2024 6:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/7/24 6:35 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/7/2024 5:22 PM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:11:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:

That it is literally impossible to prove that the following is false
conclusively proves that it is true and the proof really need not be
wrapped in any tuxedo.

If you consider it unfalsifiable, why do you care?
>

>
The entire body of truth is unfalsifiable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
>
That "cats" <are> "animals" is unfalsifiable because
it is inherently true.
>
You are conflating empirical with analytical truth.
Scientific principles do not exactly apply to math.
>

We can get on to other key points only after we have closure on this
{foundation of simulating halt deciders} point.

What do you need closure for? You only want agreement.
>

>
I must get closure on each of the four points of
my proof so that I know that my words can possibly
be understood. Without this publication is hopeless.
>

 Except that you don't have a "Proof" because it isn't in the form of a formal proof.
 All you have is an arguement.

A proof need not be dressed in any tuxedo. As long as correct
rebuttal has been shown to be categorically impossible then
the point has been fully proven.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer