Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/7/2024 6:21 PM, joes wrote:Nope, most of your words are just wrong. (at least when you try to talk about the actual theorems you are talking about).Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:35:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:Until other people understand that I am correct my words are
>On 6/7/2024 5:22 PM, joes wrote:Why do you care about rebuttals if you don't even consider them possible?Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:11:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:That it is literally impossible to prove that the following is false
conclusively proves that it is true and the proof really need not be
wrapped in any tuxedo.
>
too difficult to be understood making publication impossible.
My words only seem wrong on the basis of a false religiousPublication IS hopeless. As far as your words can be understood, they areI must get closure on each of the four points of my proof so that I knowWe can get on to other key points only after we have closure on thisWhat do you need closure for? You only want agreement.
{foundation of simulating halt deciders} point.
that my words can possibly be understood. Without this publication is
hopeless.
wrong. You could just post all of them.
>
belief of the nature of correct simulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.