Sujet : Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 08. Jun 2024, 01:38:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v4095d$39ri5$27@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/7/24 7:44 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 6:19 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:26:05 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/7/2024 4:00 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 09:47:35 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/7/2024 1:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-06 15:31:36 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/6/2024 10:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-06 13:53:58 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/6/2024 5:15 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-05 13:29:28 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/5/2024 2:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-04 18:02:03 +0000, olcott said:
>
A simulating halt decider cannot report on what the behavior of a
non-terminating input actually is because this would take forever.
Exactly. Didn't you say it is allowed to abort?
>
H is not allowed to report on any computation containing its actual
self because Turing machines can only take finite string inputs thus
cannot take Turing machines as inputs.
Bullshit. It can take other machines just fine. It doesn't know about
itself.
>
No actual Turing machine can be the input to any other actual Turing
machine. Turing machines only take finite string inputs.
TMs can be encoded in a finite string.
>
When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
It turns out that the behavior of Ĥ ⟨Ĥ⟩ is verifiably different
that the behavior of ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly simulated by embedded_H
even if an expert in comp theory named Jesus told you otherwise.
If can't be, amd be a correct simulation.
You just don't understand the DEFINITION of being correct.
To overcome the religious belief that they are the same one must
examine this at the x86 machine code level with complete understanding
of the x86 machine code.
SO do it, and tell us which is the first instruction where the direct exectuion of DD(DD) and the "correct simulation" of that input differ in results.
My guess is that it will be a non-simulated call to HH, where your "correct simulation" presumes incorrect behavior for the function.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
3 Jun 24 | Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 332 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 309 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 29 | | olcott |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 26 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 25 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 23 | | Mike Terry |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 22 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 21 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 20 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 13 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 12 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 10 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 9 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | wij |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 5 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 4 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 6 | | Mike Terry |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 5 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 3 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 279 | | Ben Bacarisse |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 277 | | olcott |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 73 | | Mikko |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 72 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 2 | | joes |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 67 | | Mikko |
4 Jun 24 | Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 66 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 41 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 40 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 21 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 20 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 2 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 15 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 14 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | joes |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | joes |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 5 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 17 | | Fred. Zwarts |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 16 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 5 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 23 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 22 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | joes |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 18 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 17 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 16 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 15 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 14 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 13 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 8 | | joes |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | olcott |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | Mikko |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 5 | | olcott |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 201 | | Fred. Zwarts |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 20 | | Fred. Zwarts |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Mikko |