Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard

On 6/8/24 9:52 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/8/2024 8:40 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/8/24 9:07 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/8/2024 2:01 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-06-07 22:22:19 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 6/7/2024 3:45 PM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 21:22:12 +0200 schrieb immibis:

He only ignores people now. Except Richard for some reason.

The reason being that Richard responds at the same level
>

>
You respond with persistent false assumptions that cannot be
corrected by feedback.

>
You cannot correct other people's false assumtion but
you can always present your own for comparison.
>

>
I can correct other people false assumptions iff (if and only if)
they are as interested in an honest dialogue as I am.
>

>
But you can onlly correct other people's false assumptions if they have one, and it isn't YOU with the false assumption.
>

 On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
 >>
 >> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK
 >> TO ME ABOUT UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT
 >> I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT
 >
 > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you
 > are correct, because I am not willing to put
 > that effort into your worthless claim.
 >
 That makes any statement that you make about the
behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH defamation.
 

No, things that are easily seen about that can be talked about.
What I refuse to do is try to look at the exhaustive list of possible deciders to say that none of them does what you say.
Since I don't every say that your statement is correct or incorrect, there is nothing defamitory about my statements that it doesn't apply, becasue that doesn't require the looking into that infinite set of machines.
You are just showing your ignorance of how logic works.