Sujet : Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 09. Jun 2024, 14:27:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v44aki$3harn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/9/2024 3:09 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-08 12:42:47 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/8/2024 1:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-07 22:27:22 +0000, olcott said:
>
On 6/7/2024 4:02 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 09:09:54 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/7/2024 1:22 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-06 15:18:21 +0000, olcott said:
>
All halt deciders are only allowed to report on the actual behavior of
their actual input.
>
Required even! And if they simulate, that simulation must match the
behaviour.
>
>
The most persistent false assumption that cannot possibly
be corrected without expertise in the x86 programming language.
Some people here have that.
>
Not true. An expert of simulation and simulators need not know
anything about x86. If you cannot correct a false assumption
about simulations without expertise in the x86 programming language
then you cannot correct it with that expertise, either.
>
Basically you are admitting that you don't have what it takes
and trying to incorrect get away with sating that it doesn't matter.
I do know but that is not relevant to this discussion.
People that know C have been able to understand this too.
I do know C, at least older versions. But that is not relevant,
either.
Sure it is.
typedef void (*ptr)(); // pointer to void function
void HHH(ptr P, ptr I)
{
P(I);
}
void DDD(int (*x)())
{
HHH(x, x);
}
int main()
{
HHH(DDD,DDD);
}
If you can't tell what is going on there then you
lack the minimum required prerequisite knowledge.
For people that are stuck in rebuttal mode I must make it as
precise as arithmetic so rebuttal looks ridiculously foolish.
Roughly so. Otherwise people who are not stuck in rebuttal mode
will look ridiculously foolish.
This did work on Richard. He went from denying what I said
with the strawman deception to saying that he never said it
was incorrect.
It does not really matter whether your straw man and other
deceptions are incorrect. Being a deception is incorrect
enough.
The easiest way to avoid lying about other people is to
say nothing about them.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
3 Jun 24 | Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 332 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 309 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 29 | | olcott |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 26 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 25 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 23 | | Mike Terry |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 22 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 21 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 20 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 13 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 12 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 10 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 9 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | wij |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 5 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 4 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 6 | | Mike Terry |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 5 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 3 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 2 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 279 | | Ben Bacarisse |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 277 | | olcott |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 73 | | Mikko |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 72 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 2 | | joes |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 67 | | Mikko |
4 Jun 24 | Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 66 | | olcott |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 41 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 40 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 21 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 20 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 2 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 15 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 14 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | John Smith |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | joes |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | joes |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 5 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 2 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 17 | | Fred. Zwarts |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 16 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 5 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Fred. Zwarts |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 4 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 23 | | Mikko |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 22 | | olcott |
5 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | joes |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 18 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 17 | | olcott |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 16 | | Mikko |
6 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 15 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 14 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 13 | | olcott |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 8 | | joes |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 7 | | olcott |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 6 | | Mikko |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 5 | | olcott |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
8 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 3 | | Mikko |
7 Jun 24 | Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways | 1 | | immibis |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | immibis |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 201 | | Fred. Zwarts |
4 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Mike Terry |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 20 | | Fred. Zwarts |
3 Jun 24 | Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? | 1 | | Mikko |