Sujet : Re: Is NPC useless?
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 11. Jun 2024, 12:46:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8ede5c7eb5a672de9bdaea8e7e4d038a8abc5194.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 11:40 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
NPC specifies a set of very significant problems, and identifies such
problems. So, is very useful. But, let p="Determin whether a given
number n is 5". If NPC cannot exclude p in NPC, what is the usefulness
of NPC?
You've just explained why it's useful. It's at the heart of the P/NP
question -- almost literally. You hypothesise that "NPC cannot exclude
p in NPC" but we don't know that. That's the core of the problem you
thought you had (or at least claimed to have) solved.
The problem is: If the problem whether or not p is a NPC cannot be proved, then
all those proofs proving problems, say q, is not NPC must be false proofs.
Because that q must be Ptime reduciable between p.
To be spedific, proving problem p cannot be reduced to problem SAT is obvious
to me. Just by actually programming it, not by abstract deduction, no info. there.