Re: Is NPC useless?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Is NPC useless?
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 11. Jun 2024, 12:46:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8ede5c7eb5a672de9bdaea8e7e4d038a8abc5194.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 11:40 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
 
NPC specifies a set of very significant problems, and identifies such
problems.  So, is very useful. But, let p="Determin whether a given
number n is 5". If NPC cannot exclude p in NPC, what is the usefulness
of NPC?
 
You've just explained why it's useful.  It's at the heart of the P/NP
question -- almost literally.  You hypothesise that "NPC cannot exclude
p in NPC" but we don't know that.  That's the core of the problem you
thought you had (or at least claimed to have) solved.

The problem is: If the problem whether or not p is a NPC cannot be proved, then
all those proofs proving problems, say q, is not NPC must be false proofs.
Because that q must be Ptime reduciable between p.

To be spedific, proving problem p cannot be reduced to problem SAT is obvious
to me. Just by actually programming it, not by abstract deduction, no info. there.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jun 24 * Is NPC useless?6wij
11 Jun 24 `* Re: Is NPC useless?5Ben Bacarisse
11 Jun 24  `* Re: Is NPC useless?4wij
12 Jun 24   `* Re: Is NPC useless?3Ben Bacarisse
12 Jun 24    `* Re: Is NPC useless?2wij
12 Jun 24     `- Re: Is NPC useless?1Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal