Sujet : Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 17. Jun 2024, 15:14:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4pcs0$ln46$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/16/2024 4:58 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
On 2024-06-16 15:06, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
If you'd've simply stuck to turing machines all along, you could have
avoided a lot of the confusion you've got yourself into. Why not start
talking about turing machines now?
Olcott has made it clear that he has absolutely no idea what Turing Machines are or how they work. He likes bringing them up (even insisting on calling his C programs "TMs" or "UTMs"), but there's no possibility that he will start discussing actual Turing machines. They're entirely outside of his purview.
André
It will only address that here
[Simulating termination analyzers for dummies]
It has all of the reasoning in one place not strewn
about here and there.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…