Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)

On 6/20/24 11:04 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/20/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-06-20 05:15:37 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

>

Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.

>

I really don't care what you believe.
It is not about belief.
It is about correct reasoning.

>
No, it is not. It is about language maintenance. If you cannot present
your reasoning in Common Language it does not matter whether your
reasoning is correct.
>

 I cannot possibly present my reasoning in a convincing way
to people that have already made up their mind and closed it
thus fail to trace through each step of this reasoning looking
for an error and finding none.

BNo, we are open to new ideas that have an actual factual

 If you simply leap to the false assumption that I am wrong
yet fail to point out any mistake because there are no mistakes
this will only convince gullible fools that also lack sufficient
technical competence.
 

We don't leap from false assumption, we start with DEFINTIONS.
YOU seem to leap to the false assumption that you can just change the definitions, which you can not.
When your statement are base on false definitions, that you refuse to see are wrong, you are just stuck in your lies, and think the world is against you, when what is against you is TRUTH, because your world is just built on LIES.