Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.com (joes)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 28. Jun 2024, 17:21:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v5mnu0$1d3t3$1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:21:15 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/28/2024 4:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-06-27 17:38:12 +0000, olcott said:
On 6/27/2024 12:25 PM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:56:56 -0500 schrieb olcott:

You are wrong. The input is the variable in the question. The question
is not a part of the input.
The input is the machine address of the finite string of x86 machine
code.
And in that input there is no question about whether itself halts.
That is in the programming of the analyser.

The input is a specific finite string of bytes that has the semantics
of the x86 programming language.
For a decider that is made for that sort of input. But there cannot be
any question in that input.
The question is:
Does this finite string of machine code specify behavior that terminates
normally?
And the question is not: Do I, the analyser, give the correct answer?
It has no power to declare itself the authority.

None-the-less no-one here understands that every halt decider is
only required to report on the behavior that its actual input
actually maps to.
What do you even mean? Of course it follows its programming and does not
spontaneously generate an answer. It may not be possible to write such
a program: then there is indeed no machine that can compute it, but the
input still has a defined halting status


Instead everyone here expects that the halt decider must map to the
English description of what the authors of textbooks expect it to
map to.
That is the definition of a halt decider. If it does not fit that
definition, it is not one.
Some definitions ARE incorrect.
That definition is not incorrect.

When I define Snitfinbangflizzledroop as the square-root of
misconceptions about the US constitution my definition is incorrect
because there is no mapping from the input of misconceptions about the
US constitution to any square-root value.
There is an obvious mapping from D to its behaviour: run it, or give it
to any simulator /that it does not call/.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jun 24 * Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)79Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24 `* DDD correctly emulated by H078olcott
22 Jun 24  +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24  i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
22 Jun 24  i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Richard Damon
25 Jun 24  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H074joes
25 Jun 24   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H073olcott
25 Jun 24    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H072Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24     +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H05olcott
25 Jun 24     i+- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24     i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03joes
25 Jun 24     i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
25 Jun 24     i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01joes
25 Jun 24     +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H064Ben Bacarisse
25 Jun 24     i+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions2olcott
26 Jun 24     ii`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24     i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H061Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24     i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met60olcott
26 Jun 24     i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met59Richard Damon
26 Jun 24     i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met58olcott
26 Jun 24     i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met57Richard Damon
26 Jun 24     i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met56olcott
26 Jun 24     i      +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met36Richard Damon
26 Jun 24     i      i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met35olcott
26 Jun 24     i      i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met34Richard Damon
26 Jun 24     i      i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met33olcott
26 Jun 24     i      i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met32Richard Damon
26 Jun 24     i      i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met31olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met30Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met29olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met28Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met27olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met26Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met25Mike Terry
27 Jun 24     i      i           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met23Mike Terry
27 Jun 24     i      i           i+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met19Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met10Mike Terry
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           iiii`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met7Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           iii     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
28 Jun 24     i      i           iii      `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met8olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met7Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           ii      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
28 Jun 24     i      i           ii       `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i      i           i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2Mike Terry
27 Jun 24     i      i           i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1olcott
27 Jun 24     i      i           `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1olcott
26 Jun 24     i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met19Mikko
26 Jun 24     i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met18olcott
27 Jun 24     i        +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24     i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met16Mikko
27 Jun 24     i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met15olcott
27 Jun 24     i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met14Mikko
27 Jun 24     i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met13olcott
27 Jun 24     i            +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6joes
27 Jun 24     i            i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5olcott
28 Jun 24     i            i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4Mikko
28 Jun 24     i            i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3olcott
28 Jun 24     i            i   +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1joes
29 Jun 24     i            i   `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Mikko
28 Jun 24     i            +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
28 Jun 24     i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Mikko
28 Jun 24     i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
28 Jun 24     i              +- Re: Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1joes
29 Jun 24     i              +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
29 Jun 24     i              `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Mikko
25 Jun 24     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02Mike Terry
25 Jun 24      `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal