Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH

On 6/28/2024 2:18 PM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:53:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/28/2024 12:41 PM, joes wrote:

Thanks for leaving the unanswered questions in place, though I’d rather
have you answer them.

I rest my case.
 

Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:05:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/28/2024 11:26 AM, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:25:36 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/28/2024 8:14 AM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:30:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:

 

To the caller DDD, which then returns to its own caller H0, which
returns „halting” to main… hold on.

Why doesn’t the first recursive H return?
 

HHH(DDD)
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
proves to the outer directly executed HHH that it must abort and reject.
Alternatively
HHH(DDD)
here:
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
goto here: until out-of-memory error.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer