Sujet : Re: olcott seems to be willfully ignorant
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 03. Jul 2024, 06:09:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <81c6f726960800a54687c039b5a2f40c44c50ea9@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 22:07:13 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
And the x86 language says the same thing,
YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give
the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively proves
that it is correct.
Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to the
final end.
void Infinite_Loop()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
}
Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
Like that an infinite loop doesn’t end?
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…