Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 20:42:58 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/1/24 8:49 AM, olcott wrote:

On 7/1/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/30/24 10:27 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/30/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/30/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/30/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/30/24 9:03 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/30/2024 7:44 PM,
Richard Damon wrote:

And, since the HHH that DDD calls will abort is emulation, it WILL
return to DDD and it will return also.

The emulation stops, and the emulating behavor of HHH stops, but not
the behavior of the input.

The "Behavior of the Input" comes from the input alone, and doesn't
depend on the emulator doing anything.
 

Static strings do not become dynamic processes unless and until they are
simulated.
 

The emulation only REVEALS the behavior to the decider, not create it.

The input describes a program that doesn’t stop when run, regardless
whether you actually run it (in part or whole).

--
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.