Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Jul 2024, 17:03:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <c1f8cd395cbc33748f6b82112a1a26fe5df15da1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:32:10 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 8:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 07:53:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 6:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:55:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Similarly, if you think that HHH can simulate itself correctly, you
are wrong.
int H(ptr p, ptr i);
int main()
{
return H(main, 0);
}
You showed that H returns, but that the simulation thinks it does
not return.
main correctly emulated by H never stops running unless aborted.
As a matter of fact, H does abort it. H then returns to main,
which then stops running.
main correctly simulated by H never returns.
I was talking about main itself.
That is not the one that HHH examines.
Huh? HHH examines main. Sure, it doesn’t /simulate/ the return.
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…