Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Jul 2024, 18:24:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <83a2ddb381b16ac04f10a99c0420bbf61e32fbed@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 10:58:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 10:03 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:32:10 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 8:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jul 2024 07:53:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/4/2024 6:09 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:55:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Similarly, if you think that HHH can simulate itself correctly,
you are wrong.
int H(ptr p, ptr i);
int main()
{
return H(main, 0);
}
You showed that H returns, but that the simulation thinks it does
not return.
main correctly emulated by H never stops running unless aborted.
As a matter of fact, H does abort it. H then returns to main,
which then stops running.
main correctly simulated by H never returns.
I was talking about main itself.
That is not the one that HHH examines.
Huh? HHH examines main. Sure, it doesn’t /simulate/ the return.
You don't know enough about operating system programming to understand
this.
This isn’t about OS programming.
There is more than one main() process. One of them cannot possibly halt
and the other one halts.
That makes no sense. They have exactly the same code.
-- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:Objectively I am a genius.
…