Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2

Op 16.jul.2024 om 15:54 schreef olcott:

On 7/16/2024 3:23 AM, joes wrote:

Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:03:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/15/2024 3:58 PM, joes wrote:

Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:52:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/15/2024 9:04 AM, joes wrote:

Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:23:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/15/2024 3:59 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:35:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/14/2024 10:02 PM, Mike Terry wrote:

>

Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.

It's just that the input HHH halts and does not need to be aborted.

At the point that it is aborted it did need to be aborted

Because it hadn't halted yet?

Because HHH has seen a repeating state that proves that DDD correctly
emulated by HHH cannot possibly ever stop running unless aborted.

Which state is it that repeats forever?

*It had never been which state DOES repeat forever*
*It has always been which state WOULD repeat forever if not aborted*

Well then, which state of HHH would repeat forever?
>

 *You still have it wrong*.
It is not "which state of HHH would repeat forever?"
It is: Which state of HHH would repeat forever if not aborted?

But HHH aborts, so the unless is misleading. Dreaming of an HHH that does not abort is irrelevant.
Therefore, the question is:
Well then, which state of HHH would repeat forever?