Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie tries to get away with mere rhetoric as a rebuttal

On 7/20/2024 4:19 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
 [ .... ]
 

May God have mercy on your soul (if you have a soul).

 Oh, I have a soul, all right.  I don't have a god, though.  ;-)
 

-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

 

Rebuttals like yours are entirely baseless by failing to point out any mistake.
My proof shown below is a truism thus is necessarily correct.
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
int main()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}
Of the two hypothetical possible ways that HHH can be encoded:
(a) HHH(DDD) is encoded to abort its simulation.
(b) HHH(DDD) is encoded to never abort its simulation.
We can know that (b) is wrong because this fails to meet the design requirement that HHH must itself halt.
We also know that any simulation that must be aborted to prevent the infinite execution of the simulator is necessarily a non-halting input.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott
"Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
  Genius hits a target no one else can see."
  Arthur Schopenhauer