Sujet : Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 23. Jul 2024, 16:32:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7oeu4$17h8r$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/23/2024 2:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-07-22 16:08:31 +0000, olcott said:
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
int main()
{
HHH(DDD);
}
>
Of the two hypothetical possible ways that HHH can be encoded:
(a) HHH(DDD) is encoded to abort its simulation.
(b) HHH(DDD) is encoded to never abort its simulation.
>
We can know that (b) is wrong because this fails to meet the design requirement that HHH must itself halt.
>
We also know that any simulation that must be aborted to prevent the infinite execution of the simulator is necessarily a non-halting input.
What was wrong in the original "Hypothetical possibilities"?
How is V2 fixed?
I don't know. One of the readers got confused so I rewrote it.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Hypothetical possibilities V2
Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2
