Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 7/27/2024 1:54 AM, Mikko wrote:A more accurate paraphrase would be "Olcott is an idiot". Even thatIf a simulator correctly simulates a finite number of instructionsI paraphrase this as the requirement for a termination analyzer
where x86 program specifies an execution of an infinite number of
instructions then the simulation deviates from x86 semantics at the
point where the simulation stops but the x86 semantics specify
countinuation.
to never terminate. That *is* a ridiculously stupid requirement.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.