Re: Because I have repeated this same point 500 times in the last three years...

On 2024-07-27 14:15:21 +0000, olcott said:

On 7/27/2024 2:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-07-26 13:17:19 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 7/26/2024 3:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-07-26 01:49:46 +0000, olcott said:
 

If you understand the x86 language and can't tell how DDD
emulated by HHH differs from DDD emulated by HHH1 by the
following then you are probably lying about understanding
the x86 language.

 Any emulation of DDD that differs from DDD is wrong.
 

 OK so you are lying about knowing the x86 language
or don't bother to study the execution trace well enough.

The latter. Your execution traces are incomplete so it is not possible
to study them well enough. For example, after each instruction the
contentents of the changed registers should be shown.
Even without a detailed analysis of the traces it is easy to see that
you have not proven your claims. In particular, most of the trace lines
are not quoted in a sentence, which means that you have not proven anyting
about them, and in particular neither that they cause the termination of
the computation specified by the input nor that they do nor cause.
--
Mikko