Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 7/28/2024 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote:And that is the behavior of the program that the input specifies, which must be a FULL program.On 2024-07-27 14:21:50 +0000, olcott said:Halt deciders report the halt status on the basis
>On 7/27/2024 2:46 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-07-26 16:28:43 +0000, olcott said:>
>No decider is ever accountable for the behavior of the>
computation that itself is contained within.
That claim is fully unjustified. How do you even define "accountable"
in the context of computations, automata, and deciders?
int sum(int x, int y){ return x + y; }
sum(5,6) is not accountable for reporting sum(3,2).
That claim is fully unjustified. How do you even define "accountable"
in the context of computations, automata, and deciders?
>It computes the mapping from its input to the value of their sum.>
That's obvious but is it relevant?
>HHH must compute the mapping from its input finite string>
of the x86 machine code of DDD to the behavior that this
finite string specifies and then report on the halt status
of this behavior.
Now is that relevant?
>
of the behavior that a finite string input specifies.
Did you think that halt deciders report the haltNope.
status on some other basis?
Halt deciders are not allowed to report on the behaviorOf course they are if that is what the input specifies by fully describing the algorithm of that program.
of the actual computation that they themselves are contained
within. They are only allowed to compute the mapping from
input finite strings.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.