Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 13. Aug 2024, 13:55:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9fl4k$3se8c$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/13/2024 2:29 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 12.aug.2024 om 14:42 schreef olcott:
On 8/11/2024 2:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 11.aug.2024 om 13:45 schreef olcott:
>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
None-the-less it is clear that of the above specified infinite
set DDD correctly emulated by each element of that set never
reaches its own "return" instruction halt state.
>
Since no DDD is correctly simulated by HHH, we are talking about the properties of an empty set.
But, indeed, the simulation of DDD by HHH fails to reach the halt state. It aborts one cycle before the simulated HHH would reach its 'return' instruction, after which DDD would reach its halt state.
>
>
My words must be understandable by ordinary C programmers
and computer scientists. The latter tend to conclude that
my work is incorrect as soon as they know the subject matter
before actually seeing what I said.
>
Every C programmer understands that a simulation fails if it does not reach the end of a halting program.
>
Four expert C programmers (two with masters degrees in
computer science) agree that DDD correctly simulated by
HHH does not halt.
>
Many more experts with master degrees tell you that it does halt.
Show evidence instead of authority.
*Every attempt at rebutting this has been*
(a) Denying verified facts
(b) Strawman-deception of changing what I said and rebutting that
(c) Pure ad hominem insults with zero reasoning
Mike is the only one here that seems to have enough technical
skill to understand the verified facts. Everyone else denies them
entirely on the basis of their own ignorance.
Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior
We prove that the simulation is correct.
Then we prove that this simulation cannot possibly
reach its final halt state / ever stop running without being aborted.
The semantics of the x86 language conclusive proves this is true.
Thus when we measure the behavior specified by this finite
string by DDD correctly simulated/emulated by HHH it specifies
non-halting behavior.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal