Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head

On 8/15/24 12:26 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/15/2024 5:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-15 02:03:44 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 8/14/2024 6:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

Note, its "Behavior" is defined as what it would do when run, even if it never is,
>

>
No that is the big mistake of comp theory where it violates
its own rules.

>
The big mistake is yours where you violate the rules of computation
theory and honest discussion.
>

 It is at least the case that conventional halting
problem proofs violate one of the rules of the theory
of computation.
 

And what rule is that?
You can't seem to quote it, and were it comes from.
All you can do is quote the rules YOU made up out of your zero-knowledge study of the field, which don't count.
Sorry, you have just made yourself totally stupid on this, and so stupid you can't see your own ignorance, which becomes the worse kind of stupid.