Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head

On 8/15/24 12:26 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/15/2024 5:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-15 02:03:44 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 8/14/2024 6:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

Note, its "Behavior" is defined as what it would do when run, even if it never is,
>

>
No that is the big mistake of comp theory where it violates
its own rules.

>
The big mistake is yours where you violate the rules of computation
theory and honest discussion.
>

>
It is at least the case that conventional halting
problem proofs violate one of the rules of the theory
of computation.
>

 And what rule is that?