Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts

On 2024-08-16 21:08:05 +0000, olcott said:

On 8/16/2024 3:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/16/24 4:36 PM, olcott wrote:

 I break my points down to the basic facts of the semantics
of the x86 language and the basic facts of the semantics
of the C programming.
 I can't ever get to the point of the computer science
because reviewers disagree with these basic facts.

 No, the problem is that your "facts" just disagree with the computere science you claim to be doing.
 

 We never get anywhere near the computer science because
people disagree with 100% concrete fully specified semantics.

You will never get anywhere near the computer (or any other) science.
No "because" will get you any nearer. The only way to get nearer
would be learning but you cant learn before you learn Common Language
or some other language.
--
Mikko