Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth

On 8/17/2024 1:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/17/24 2:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/17/2024 7:29 AM, olcott wrote:
 > void DDD()
 > {
 >    HHH(DDD);
 > }
 >
 > _DDD()
 > [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
 > [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
 > [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
 > [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
 > [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
 > [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
 > [00002183] c3         ret
 > Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
 >
 > *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
 > *the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
 > *running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)

>
Thus DDD has direct access to HHH in this shared memory space.
>

 And thus ALL of memory is part of the input,

Any additional details have no effect what-so-ever on my claim.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer