Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4

On 8/19/2024 9:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/19/24 10:17 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/19/2024 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/19/24 10:06 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/19/2024 8:55 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/19/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:

On 8/19/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/19/24 8:50 PM, olcott wrote:

>
>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
*It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
*the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
*running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)

>
No, it is just a basic fact that NO emulator can properly emulate the about input past the 4th instruction, as the data just isn't provided.
>

>
The data is provided, but I did not say that the data
is not provided to an ordinary regular bath tub rubber
duck on a big blue sticker, and I won't.

>
WHERE is it provided?
>
You said only what was EXPLICITLY stated could be used.
>

>
Not any more I took that part out.

>
No you didn't, it is still in the base message of the thread.
>
To change the foundation of an arguement you need to make a CLEAR and obvious break from your previous on.
>

 see V5