Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2

On 8/19/2024 2:36 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-18 12:32:54 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 8/17/2024 7:29 AM, olcott wrote:

void DDD()
{
  HHH(DDD);
}
 _DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
 *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
*the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
*running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)
 

 X = DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86 language
Y = HHH never aborts its emulation of DDD
Z = DDD never stops running
 (X ∧ Y) ↔ Z

 What was wrong in the original version?
 

 I appended the above formula