Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser
De : F.Zwarts (at) *nospam* HetNet.nl (Fred. Zwarts)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 22. Aug 2024, 09:16:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va6s5i$c9tl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Op 22.aug.2024 om 06:22 schreef olcott:
On 8/21/2024 10:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/21/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/21/2024 9:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/21/24 9:55 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/21/2024 8:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/21/24 9:23 PM, olcott wrote:
On 8/21/2024 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/21/24 8:30 AM, olcott wrote:
On 8/21/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-21 03:01:38 +0000, olcott said:
>
*We are only talking about one single point*
Professor Sipser must have understood that an HHH(DDD)
that does abort is supposed predict what would happen
if it never aborted.
>
Professor Sipser understood that what is not a part of the text
is not a part of the agreement. What H is required to predict
is fully determined by the words "halt decider H". The previous
word "simulating" refers to an implementation detail and does
not affect the requirements.
>
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
     stop running unless aborted then
>
     H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
     specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>
It is crucial to the requirements in that it specifies that
H is required to predict
(a) The behavior specified by the finite string D
>
Which must include *ALL* of the code of the PROGRAM D, which includes ALL the code of everything it calls, which includes H, so with your system, changing H gives a DIFFERENT input, which is not comparable in behavior to this input.
>
(b) As measured by the correct partial simulation of D by H
>
Nope, by H correctly predicting, with a partial simulation of D by H if possible, if the COMPLETE simulaiton by a "hypothetical H" replacing H but not changing the input, would never halt.
>
(c) When H would never abort its simulation of F
>
Which, since that isn't the case, put you into the realm of fantasy.
>
(d) This includes H simulating itself simulating D
>
Right, H must CORRECTLY predict the behavior of an UNABORTED emulation of its input, and if, and only if, it can determine that such an emulation would never halt, then it can abort its emulation.
>
Note, that is the emulation of this exact input, including D calling the ORIGINAL H, not changing to the Hypothetical, since by the rules of the field, the input is a fixed string, and fully defines the behavior of the input.
>
>
You are contradicting yourself.
Your ADD may prevent you from
concentrating well enough to see this.
>
>
I was right, you couldn't name it so you are just admiting that you are a liar trying to create an ad hominem attack that failed.
>
>
I have been over this same point again and again and again and
your "rebuttal" is changing the subject or calling me stupid.
>
>
What "change of subject", I just point out what the words you try to use actually mean, and why your claims are wrong by the rules of the system you claim to be working in.
>
The fact that you don't understand DOES make you stupid. I don't say you are wrong because you are stupid, you are wrong because the words you use don't mean what you think they do, and thus your conclusions are just incorrect.
>
That you seem to NEVER LEARN is what makes you stupid.
>
Professor Sipser clearly agreed that an H that does
a finite simulation of D is to predict the behavior
of an unlimited simulation of D.
>
Right, H needs to predict in a finite number of steps, what an unlimited simulation of this EXACT input, which means that it must call the H that you claim to be getting the right answer, which is the H that does abort and return non-halting.
>
>
OK then you seem to have this correctly, unless you interpret
this as a self-contradiction.
>
>
Why do you think it could be a self-contradiction?
>
It is an impossiblity for H to correctly due it, but that is why the Halting Problem is non-computable.
>
 THIS EXACTLY MATCHES THE SIPSER APPROVED CRITERIA
The finite HHH(DDD) emulates itself emulating DDD exactly once
and this is sufficient for this HHH to predict what a different
HHH(DDD) do that never aborted its emulation of its input.
 
But that different hypothetical HHH is a non-input. Do you still not understand that HHH should predict the behaviour of its input? Why does the HHH have an input, if it is correct to predict the behaviour of a non-input?
Are you still cheating with the Root variable to change the input in a non-input?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Aug 24 * Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5326olcott
20 Aug 24 +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5323Richard Damon
20 Aug 24 i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5322olcott
20 Aug 24 i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5321Richard Damon
20 Aug 24 i  +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V515olcott
20 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V55joes
20 Aug 24 i  ii`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V54olcott
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
27 Aug 24 i  ii `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
20 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V58Fred. Zwarts
20 Aug 24 i  ii`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V57olcott
20 Aug 24 i  ii +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V53joes
20 Aug 24 i  ii i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52olcott
21 Aug 24 i  ii i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i  ii `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i  ii  `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
27 Aug 24 i  i`- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51Mikko
20 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5305olcott
21 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5304Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser303olcott
21 Aug 24 i     +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser300Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser299olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser296Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser295olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser293Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser292olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser284Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser283olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3joes
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser11Fred. Zwarts
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser10olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3joes
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser5Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser4olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser267Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i+* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser3olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i ii+- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i ii`- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser263olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser262Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser261olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser84Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser83olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser82Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser81olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser29Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser28olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Python
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser24joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser23olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser5joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser4olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser15Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser14olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser11Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser10olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser8Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser7olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser6Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser5olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i i   `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser31joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser30olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser28joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser27olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser26Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i    `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input25olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input10joes
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input9olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input8Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input4Mikko
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input13Fred. Zwarts
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser19Mikko
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser176joes
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser6Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
20 Aug 24 `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal