Sujet : Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 24. Aug 2024, 16:35:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vacr3e$1e36g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/24/2024 9:27 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:21:45 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 8/24/2024 3:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 23.aug.2024 om 23:40 schreef olcott:
On 8/23/2024 2:24 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:42:59 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>
Only IF it will in fact keep repeating, which is not the case.
Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*
It is the case only if you still cheat with the Root variable, which
makes that HHH processes a non-input, when it is requested to predict
the behaviour of the input.
The fact is that it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating,
thus *IT DOES* get the correct answer.
The simulated, aborting HHH would… abort.
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
stop running unless aborted then
Maybe if you read and reread that again and again 10,000 times
you will be able to pay COMPLETE ATTENTION TO ALL OF ITS WORDS.
Or maybe you are just playing head games.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…