Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Op 24.aug.2024 om 15:21 schreef olcott:That THE DECISION IS CORRECT makes moot how the decision was made.On 8/24/2024 3:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:The fact is that it only happens because you make it so with cheating with the Root variable.Op 23.aug.2024 om 23:40 schreef olcott:>On 8/23/2024 2:24 AM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:42:59 -0500 schrieb olcott:>Only IF it will in fact keep repeating, which is not the case.>
Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*
Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*
Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*
Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*It is the case only if you still cheat with the Root variable, which makes that HHH processes a non-input, when it is requested to predict the behaviour of the input.>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
stop running unless aborted then
>
H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>
The fact is that it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating,
thus *IT DOES* get the correct answer.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.