Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases

On 9/2/24 9:33 AM, olcott wrote:

On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said:
>

*I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases*
>
knowledge is a justified true belief such that the
justification is sufficient reason to accept the
truth of the belief.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem

>
The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition
of "sufficient reason".
>

 Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic
entailment from verified facts.
 

But is something that you can't KNOW to be true.
You demonstate this property perfectly. Your claim to "verified facts" that are just incorrect proves that we have a problem trying to have a actual working and usable definition of knowledge.