Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 05. Sep 2024, 17:34:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <e097e72a4319eb72e8663d055aa54d69af610831@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:10:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 9/5/2024 10:57 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said:
On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said:

Show the details of how DDD emulated by HHH reaches its own machine
address 0000217f.
By HHH returning, which we are guaranteed from its definition as a
decider.
How the F--- Does the emulated HHH return?
I don’t know, you claim it’s a decider!

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Sep 24 * Defining a correct simulating halt decider193olcott
2 Sep 24 +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
2 Sep 24 +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider39Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24 i+* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider27olcott
2 Sep 24 ii+- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
3 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
4 Sep 24 iii +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
4 Sep 24 iii `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider21joes
3 Sep 24 ii +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1olcott
3 Sep 24 ii `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider19olcott
3 Sep 24 ii  +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider13joes
3 Sep 24 ii  i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider12olcott
4 Sep 24 ii  i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
4 Sep 24 ii  i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider10Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24 ii  i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider9olcott
5 Sep 24 ii  i   +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
5 Sep 24 ii  i   `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider7Fred. Zwarts
5 Sep 24 ii  i    +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
6 Sep 24 ii  i    i+- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 ii  i    i`- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 ii  i    `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
7 Sep 24 ii  i     +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 ii  i     `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24 ii  +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
4 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24 ii   `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
5 Sep 24 ii    +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
5 Sep 24 ii    `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider11olcott
3 Sep 24 i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
3 Sep 24 i +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider7Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 i i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider6olcott
4 Sep 24 i i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
4 Sep 24 i i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24 i i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
5 Sep 24 i i   +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
5 Sep 24 i i   `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider2joes
3 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1olcott
3 Sep 24 +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
3 Sep 24 i+- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
3 Sep 24 i`- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24 +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider148Mikko
3 Sep 24 i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider147olcott
4 Sep 24 i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
5 Sep 24 i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider145Mikko
5 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider144olcott
5 Sep 24 i   +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider56joes
5 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider55olcott
5 Sep 24 i   i +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider52joes
5 Sep 24 i   i i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider51olcott
5 Sep 24 i   i i +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider48joes
5 Sep 24 i   i i i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider47olcott
5 Sep 24 i   i i i +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider41joes
5 Sep 24 i   i i i i+* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider9olcott
5 Sep 24 i   i i i ii`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider8joes
5 Sep 24 i   i i i ii +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider2olcott
6 Sep 24 i   i i i ii i`- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   i i i ii +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i ii i+- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i ii i`- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1joes
7 Sep 24 i   i i i ii `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider2olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i ii  `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider31olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider29joes
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider28olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider17Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider16olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider15Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider14olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i   `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider13Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i    `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider12olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i     `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider11Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i      `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider10olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i       `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider9Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i        +* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i        i`* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i        i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider2olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i        i  `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i        `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i         `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i          `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider2olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i i   i           `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
8 Sep 24 i   i i i i   `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider10Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24 i   i i i i    `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider9olcott
8 Sep 24 i   i i i i     +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
9 Sep 24 i   i i i i     `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider7Fred. Zwarts
9 Sep 24 i   i i i i      `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider6olcott
10 Sep 24 i   i i i i       +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
10 Sep 24 i   i i i i       `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24 i   i i i i        `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
11 Sep 24 i   i i i i         +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24 i   i i i i         `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   i i i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   i i i `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider4Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 i   i i i  `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider3olcott
7 Sep 24 i   i i i   +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i   i i i   `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 i   i i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   i i `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 i   i +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   i `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i   +- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider85Mikko
11 Sep 24 `- Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider1R. Swipe

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal