Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 9/6/2024 5:22 AM, Mikko wrote:The simulated HHH is not the same if it doesn’t abort. The constructionOn 2024-09-03 13:58:27 +0000, olcott said:That is not exactly true. There is a directly executed HHH that always>Anyone who really knows either x86 assembly or machine langage or C can
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173]
8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push
00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call
HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
Anyone that is not dumber than a box of rocks can tell that machine
address 0000217f is unreachable for every DDD emulated by HHH
according to the semantics of the x86 language where HHH emulates
itself emulating DDD.
see that the machine address 217f is unreachachable only if the program
at 000015d2, named HHH, does not return.
returns and a DDD emulated by HHH that calls an emulated HHH that never
returns.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.