Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 9/10/2024 6:45 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Yes, the simulation stops before it could reach the instructions at 0000217f, 00002182, 00002182 and the end of the program, which shows that the simulation failed. These instructions are reachable, as proven by direct execution, the unmodified world class simulator and even by HHH1.Op 09.sep.2024 om 20:55 schreef olcott:_DDD()On 9/9/2024 6:11 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Claim without evidence.Op 08.sep.2024 om 16:16 schreef olcott:>On 9/8/2024 5:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 07.sep.2024 om 16:54 schreef olcott:>On 9/7/2024 9:46 AM, joes wrote:>Am Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:38:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 9/5/2024 12:22 PM, joes wrote:>Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:17:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 9/5/2024 11:56 AM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:52:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 9/5/2024 11:34 AM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:10:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 9/5/2024 10:57 AM, joes wrote:Am Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:24:20 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 9/5/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-09-03 13:00:50 +0000, olcott said:On 9/3/2024 5:25 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-09-02 16:38:03 +0000, olcott said:Except for the outermost one.When HHH is waiting for the next HHH which is waiting for the next HHHBut why does HHH halt and return that itself doesn’t halt?The first HHH cannot wait for its HHH to abort which is waiting forThe directly executed HHH correctly determines that its emulated DDDWhy doesn’t the simulated HHH abort?
must be aborted because DDD keeps *THE EMULATED HHH* stuck in
recursive emulation.
its HHH to abort on and on with no HHH ever aborting.
which is waiting for the next HHH...
we have an infinite chain of waiting and never aborting.
>
When the outermost HHH is waiting for its emulated HHH
to abort and this emulated HHH is waiting on its emulated
HHH to abort on and on forever waiting and none ever abort.
>
Dreaming again of a HHH that does not abort.
In other words you have no idea what a hypothesis is?
I do, but olcott thinks a dream is sufficient to prove a hypothesis.
>>>
The outermost HHH can either abort it emulation of DDD
or not and either way DDD cannot possibly reach its final
halt state of its "return" instruction and halt.
Exactly, so either way the simulation fails to reach the end.
HHH cannot possibly simulate itself correctly up to the end.
Thus must be aborted and is necessarily correct to report non-halting.
>
>
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002182] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
DDD emulated by the directly executed HHH derives these steps:
00002172, 00002173, 00002175, 0000217a
The last of these steps calld HHH(DDD)
HHH emulated by the directly executed HHH cannot possibly deriveYes olcott's modifications of the world class makes it impossible to reach this reachable code.
any other steps and I have proved this by the actual execution trace
by a world class x86 emulator libx86emu.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.