Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider --- Trump and Hitler

On 9/12/2024 3:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 9/12/24 2:42 PM, olcott wrote:

On 9/12/2024 1:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>
So, you ADMIT that you have lied about the ability to PROVE your statement as an actual ANALYTIC PROOF.
>

>
"Proof" in a court of law is not a mathematical proof, dipshit?.

 Right, so your claiming the development of a system of LOGIC means you are not talking about "legal proof" (to the specified level of doubt) but the mathematical level where proof means ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY.
 

Absolute certainty within a set of axioms.
When we search the body of everything that was ever written
down and find that there was never any actual evidence of
election fraud that was sufficient to change the outcome of
the 2020 presidential election then we can say with 100%
perfect certainty that this evidence does not exist in
everything that was ever written down.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer