Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question
De : nnymous109 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (nnymous109)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 26. Sep 2024, 15:57:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : RetroBBS
Message-ID : <a4cacd3261a32cb9a769fbfe6ed1cd15@www.rocksolidbbs.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Please forgive me, for I may not be able to review your own proof at the
moment. Moreover, the links you provide point to things that seem like
software packages. Might you be able to direct me to the PDF (or a
similar sort of file)?
Regarding the DOI I provided, you should be able to use it by inputting
it into this website: https://dx.doi.org/
Also, I did not know this yesterday, but alternatively, you can access
the document directly through the following link:
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/On_Higher_Order_Recursions_25SEP2024/27106759?file=49414237
Thank you

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Sep 24 * Yet another contribution to the P-NP question42nnymous109
26 Sep 24 +* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question40wij
26 Sep 24 i+* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question36nnymous109
26 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question3André G. Isaak
26 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2Mike Terry
26 Sep 24 iii `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1André G. Isaak
27 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question28Ben Bacarisse
27 Sep 24 iii+* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question25Mike Terry
27 Sep 24 iiii+- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
28 Sep 24 iiii`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question23Ben Bacarisse
28 Sep 24 iiii +* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question10Mike Terry
28 Sep 24 iiii i+- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Jeff Barnett
29 Sep 24 iiii i`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question8Ben Bacarisse
29 Sep 24 iiii i +* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question3Keith Thompson
29 Sep 24 iiii i i`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2Mike Terry
30 Sep 24 iiii i i `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Ben Bacarisse
29 Sep 24 iiii i +* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2Mike Terry
29 Sep 24 iiii i i`- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Ben Bacarisse
29 Sep 24 iiii i `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2nnymous109
30 Sep 24 iiii i  `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Ben Bacarisse
28 Sep 24 iiii `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question12nnymous109
29 Sep 24 iiii  `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question11Ben Bacarisse
29 Sep 24 iiii   `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question10nnymous109
29 Sep 24 iiii    +- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
29 Sep 24 iiii    +- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
30 Sep 24 iiii    `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question7Ben Bacarisse
30 Sep 24 iiii     +* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question5nnymous109
30 Sep 24 iiii     i+- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
1 Oct 24 iiii     i`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question3Ben Bacarisse
3 Oct 24 iiii     i `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2nnymous109
12 Oct 24 iiii     i  `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Ben Bacarisse
3 Oct 24 iiii     `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
27 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2nnymous109
28 Sep 24 iii `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Ben Bacarisse
30 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question4wij
3 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question3nnymous109
3 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2wij
5 Oct 24 ii   `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109
27 Sep 24 i`* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question3Keith Thompson
27 Sep 24 i `* Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question2wij
27 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1Keith Thompson
3 Oct 24 `- Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question1nnymous109

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal