Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question

On Thu, 2024-10-03 at 19:45 +0000, nnymous109 wrote:

Basic question: 1.What is the P and NP in the paper? 2.What kind of
contribution is to the P-NP
question?

 
 
I define supersets of P and NP, Pr and NPr, and argue that Pr != NPr.

'Superset of NP' is a problem.

Then I say that if P = NP, NP is in Pr, and I give an example of a
language in NP that is not in Pr.

Why not just give an example L, such that L∈NP and L∉P.