Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!

On 10/3/2024 7:15 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-03 02:09:39 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/2/2024 5:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/2/24 10:39 AM, olcott wrote:

On 10/2/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/1/24 7:26 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/1/2024 12:58 PM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 01 Oct 2024 12:31:41 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/1/2024 8:09 AM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 01 Oct 2024 07:39:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/1/2024 7:19 AM, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/66fbec5c-7b10-8011-9ce6-3c26424cb21c

It sounds like it’s trained on your spam. LLMs don’t know
anything anyway.

*You can continue this conversation with ChatGPT*

I’ll leave that to you.

Click on the link and see how it answers this question:
Is H a Halt Decider for D?

You should feed it our objections.
If you believe in it only when you prompt it, it is not suited as
an authority (fallacious anyway).

You feed it your objections.
It will tell you how and why you are wrong.

No, it will tell you something that matches the words you told it.
You don't seem to understand what Large Language Models are.
You seem to forget that LLM know nothing of the "truth", only what
matches their training data.
They are know to be liars, just like you.

In the case of their evaluation of my work they are correct.

*Try this yourself*
https://chatgpt.com/share/66fbec5c-7b10-8011-9ce6-3c26424cb21c
Does HHH have to abort its emulation of DDD to prevent the infinite
execution of DDD?

Try asking it
Why is it ok for HHH to say that DDD doesn't halt when it will when
run?

You guys try to pretend that the pathological relationship between HHH
and DDD does not make any difference to the behavior of DDD knowing
full well that it does make a difference.

The behaviour of DDD is what DDD does if executed. As DDD takes no
input its behavour is always the same. What does "make a difference"
mean in this context?

The behavior of the directly executed DDD is essentially the behavior of
what would otherwise be infinite recursion except that the second
recursive call has already been aborted.
This is not the same as the behavior of DDD correctly emulated by the
same emulator that it calls where HHH cannot rely on DDD being aborted
by any other process than itself.
Do an entirely different thing and expecting the same results is just as
insane as doing the same thing and expecting different results.