Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 10/6/2024 11:57 AM, Richard Damon wrote:No, YOU are the one doing equivocation, miss using the meaning of the words, because you refuse to learn their proper meaning.On 10/6/24 8:43 AM, olcott wrote:The only "rebuttal" to my paragraph is the fallacy of equivocation>>
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
exist never returns. Each of these HHH emulators that does
return 0 correctly reports the above non-halting behavior.
>
>
No, you have proven that you don't understand what is truth, but that you just prefer to lie.
>
And a big part of this is that you just chose to not learn what the word mean.
>
error and you don't have a clue what this is.
"DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH" has a very precise meaningAnd that meaning the the behavior of the program DDD, when it is executed or COMPLETELY correctly emulated, NOT the partial emulation done by the HHH that abort and answer.
that cannot be overcome by the fallacy of equivocation error.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.